Editorial Policy

This Editorial Policy explains how we prepare and maintain the written content on this website.

The subject matter is sensitive. We do not want careless writing to make a frightened parent, teen, or teacher feel more lost.

Purpose of the content

Our content is written to help adults understand AI image abuse, privacy risks, sextortion warning signs, reporting steps, and safer conversations with young people.

The goal is practical clarity. We avoid instructions that would help someone exploit another person.

Review process

Pages are reviewed for plain language, consistency, safety, and obvious factual issues before publication.

When a page covers legal, school, platform, or law-enforcement topics, we try to avoid overclaiming. A website article cannot replace advice from the right professional.

Sourcing and references

We prefer primary or reputable sources when a page needs external support, such as official regulators, platform safety centres, child protection organisations, or recognised public bodies.

Where the issue is changing quickly, we check whether old guidance still makes sense before relying on it.

Corrections

If a reader finds an error, they can contact [email protected]. Include the page, the sentence in question, and the reason you believe it should be changed.

We review correction requests without treating every disagreement as an attack. Some edits are made quickly. Others need more checking.

Independence

Commercial interests should not override user safety. If a page involves a tool, offer, or linked service, we still aim to describe the risks plainly.

We do not publish content that encourages non-consensual intimate imagery, child exploitation, harassment, blackmail, or privacy invasion.